Government of Gujarat vs Dilipbhai Shankarbhai Baria — 3869/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030045112025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3869/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2025

Registration No

3869/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821050251475

Police Station

SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Dilipbhai Shankarbhai Baria

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

25-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The court dropped all criminal proceedings and discharged the accused because the police investigation was conducted illegally. Under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2017, the offense of liquor consumption became non-cognizable (maximum 6 months punishment), requiring prior Magistrate permission before investigation. Since the investigating officer failed to obtain this mandatory permission under Section 155(2) CrPC, the entire investigation was deemed vitiated and the charge-sheet could not be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dropped all criminal proceedings and discharged the accused because the police investigation was conducted illegally. Under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2017, the offense of liquor consumption became non-cognizable (maximum 6 months punishment), requiring prior Magistrate permission before investigation. Since the investigating officer failed to obtain this mandatory permission under Section 155(2) CrPC, the entire investigation was deemed vitiated and the charge-sheet could not be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case