Government of Gujarat vs Dilipbhai Shankarbhai Baria — 3869/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030045112025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3869/2025
Filing Date
11-11-2025
Registration No
3869/2025
Registration Date
11-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821050251475
Police Station
SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dilipbhai Shankarbhai Baria
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court dropped all criminal proceedings and discharged the accused because the police investigation was conducted illegally. Under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2017, the offense of liquor consumption became non-cognizable (maximum 6 months punishment), requiring prior Magistrate permission before investigation. Since the investigating officer failed to obtain this mandatory permission under Section 155(2) CrPC, the entire investigation was deemed vitiated and the charge-sheet could not be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court dropped all criminal proceedings and discharged the accused because the police investigation was conducted illegally. Under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2017, the offense of liquor consumption became non-cognizable (maximum 6 months punishment), requiring prior Magistrate permission before investigation. Since the investigating officer failed to obtain this mandatory permission under Section 155(2) CrPC, the entire investigation was deemed vitiated and the charge-sheet could not be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts