Government of Gujarat vs Pushpakkumar Manharsinh Chauhan — 3499/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030040202025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3499/2025
Filing Date
15-09-2025
Registration No
3499/2025
Registration Date
15-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821050251215
Police Station
SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pushpakkumar Manharsinh Chauhan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused for violations under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicles Act, holding that the investigation was illegal and void. The court found that the offences were non-cognizable (maximum punishment under 3 years), yet the investigating officer failed to obtain mandatory prior permission from the competent magistrate under Section 174(2) of BNSS before initiating investigation, violating a fundamental procedural safeguard. Consequently, the accused was discharged from bail bonds, and contraband items were ordered destroyed per legal guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused for violations under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicles Act, holding that the investigation was illegal and void. The court found that the offences were non-cognizable (maximum punishment under 3 years), yet the investigating officer failed to obtain mandatory prior permission from the competent magistrate under Section 174(2) of BNSS before initiating investigation, violating a fundamental procedural safeguard. Consequently, the accused was discharged from bail bonds, and contraband items were ordered destroyed per legal guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts