Government of Gujarat vs Umeshbhai Babubhai Gari Advocate - R A PATEL — 3487/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),116B,81,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030040052025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3487/2025
Filing Date
12-09-2025
Registration No
3487/2025
Registration Date
12-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Umeshbhai Babubhai Gari Advocate - R A PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 02-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 13-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted accused Umeshbhai Babubhai Gari of charges under the Prohibition Act (IPC Sections 65(I), 116(B), and 81), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in the evidence, including that the panchas (witnesses to the seizure) turned hostile and did not support the complainant's case, and that corroborating evidence was insufficient to establish guilt. The court ordered the seized contraband (liquor bottles valued at ₹23,660) to be destroyed and directed the accused's release on bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted accused Umeshbhai Babubhai Gari of charges under the Prohibition Act (IPC Sections 65(I), 116(B), and 81), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in the evidence, including that the panchas (witnesses to the seizure) turned hostile and did not support the complainant's case, and that corroborating evidence was insufficient to establish guilt. The court ordered the seized contraband (liquor bottles valued at ₹23,660) to be destroyed and directed the accused's release on bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts