Government of Gujarat vs Umeshbhai Babubhai Gari Advocate - R A PATEL — 3487/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),116B,81,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030040052025

Case disposedSub Stage

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3487/2025

Filing Date

12-09-2025

Registration No

3487/2025

Registration Date

12-09-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(E),116B,81,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Umeshbhai Babubhai Gari Advocate - R A PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

02-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

13-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

09-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted accused Umeshbhai Babubhai Gari of charges under the Prohibition Act (IPC Sections 65(I), 116(B), and 81), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in the evidence, including that the panchas (witnesses to the seizure) turned hostile and did not support the complainant's case, and that corroborating evidence was insufficient to establish guilt. The court ordered the seized contraband (liquor bottles valued at ₹23,660) to be destroyed and directed the accused's release on bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted accused Umeshbhai Babubhai Gari of charges under the Prohibition Act (IPC Sections 65(I), 116(B), and 81), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in the evidence, including that the panchas (witnesses to the seizure) turned hostile and did not support the complainant's case, and that corroborating evidence was insufficient to establish guilt. The court ordered the seized contraband (liquor bottles valued at ₹23,660) to be destroyed and directed the accused's release on bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case