Government of Gujarat vs Mehulbhai Ratansing Baria — 3358/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030037922025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3358/2025
Filing Date
25-08-2025
Registration No
3358/2025
Registration Date
25-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821005250605
Police Station
DEVGADH BARIA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mehulbhai Ratansing Baria
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused charged under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for liquor consumption. The court found that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable offense classification, making this a non-cognizable offense with maximum punishment under six months. Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior Magistrate permission under Section 155(2) CrPC (now Section 174(2) BNSS) before investigation, the investigation was illegal and the court could not take cognizance of the vitiated report. The accused was discharged from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused charged under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for liquor consumption. The court found that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable offense classification, making this a non-cognizable offense with maximum punishment under six months. Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior Magistrate permission under Section 155(2) CrPC (now Section 174(2) BNSS) before investigation, the investigation was illegal and the court could not take cognizance of the vitiated report. The accused was discharged from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts