Government of Gujarat vs Mehulbhai Ratansing Baria — 3358/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030037922025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3358/2025

Filing Date

25-08-2025

Registration No

3358/2025

Registration Date

25-08-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821005250605

Police Station

DEVGADH BARIA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Mehulbhai Ratansing Baria

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

25-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused charged under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for liquor consumption. The court found that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable offense classification, making this a non-cognizable offense with maximum punishment under six months. Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior Magistrate permission under Section 155(2) CrPC (now Section 174(2) BNSS) before investigation, the investigation was illegal and the court could not take cognizance of the vitiated report. The accused was discharged from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused charged under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for liquor consumption. The court found that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable offense classification, making this a non-cognizable offense with maximum punishment under six months. Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior Magistrate permission under Section 155(2) CrPC (now Section 174(2) BNSS) before investigation, the investigation was illegal and the court could not take cognizance of the vitiated report. The accused was discharged from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case