Government of Gujarat vs Sureshbhai Saybabhai Nayak — 3275/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030036922025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3275/2025
Filing Date
18-08-2025
Registration No
3275/2025
Registration Date
18-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821050250643
Police Station
SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sureshbhai Saybabhai Nayak
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court dropped criminal proceedings against the accused for violations under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, finding that the investigating officer illegally conducted the investigation without obtaining mandatory prior permission from the competent magistrate. The court held that the offences were non-cognizable under the 2017 Amendment (which deleted Section 118 classifying all offences as cognizable) and that the arrest power under the Motor Vehicles Act does not alter this non-cognizable character. The accused was discharged from bail bonds, and contraband liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dropped criminal proceedings against the accused for violations under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, finding that the investigating officer illegally conducted the investigation without obtaining mandatory prior permission from the competent magistrate. The court held that the offences were non-cognizable under the 2017 Amendment (which deleted Section 118 classifying all offences as cognizable) and that the arrest power under the Motor Vehicles Act does not alter this non-cognizable character. The accused was discharged from bail bonds, and contraband liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts