Government of Gujarat vs Dashrathbhai Narsingbhai Patel Advocate - J S BARIA — 3117/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030034992025
Filing Number
3117/2025
Filing Date
04-Aug-2025
Registration No
3117/2025
Registration Date
04-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dashrathbhai Narsingbhai Patel Advocate - J S BARIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court of Devgadh Baria acquitted the accused of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash/negligent driving), finding the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies. The court noted that while the accused's identity was established, the critical element of reckless or negligent vehicle operation could not be substantiated from the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3117/2025
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court of Devgadh Baria acquitted the accused of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash/negligent driving), finding the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies. The court noted that while the accused's identity was established, the critical element of reckless or negligent vehicle operation could not be substantiated from the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts