Babubhai Bhaylabhai Parmar vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 319/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI. - JMFC

CNR: GJDH030029442026

Filing Number

319/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

319/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

1.Babubhai Bhaylabhai Parmar

Adv. D R CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
27-May-2026

OrderView PDF

The court allowed Babubhai Bhaylabhai Parmar's application for interim custody of his seized Realme C17 mobile phone, finding him to be the lawful owner based on the original purchase bill and Aadhaar card. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody risks device deterioration and, citing Supreme Court precedent, ordered release subject to conditions including execution of a bond, surety of equal value, and undertaking not to sell or transfer the phone until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
27-May-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
26-May-2026

Process To Opponent

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
25-May-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
20-May-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 319/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Babubhai Bhaylabhai Parmar's application for interim custody of his seized Realme C17 mobile phone, finding him to be the lawful owner based on the original purchase bill and Aadhaar card. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody risks device deterioration and, citing Supreme Court precedent, ordered release subject to conditions including execution of a bond, surety of equal value, and undertaking not to sell or transfer the phone until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.