Government of Gujarat vs Prakashbhai Ganpatbhai Baria Advocate - N A VANKAR — 1757/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030019682025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1757/2025
Filing Date
24-04-2025
Registration No
1757/2025
Registration Date
24-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Prakashbhai Ganpatbhai Baria Advocate - N A VANKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 02-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 24-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 21-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Devgadh Baria Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused operated his vehicle recklessly and negligently on the specified date and location. The court noted that while the complainant and investigating officer identified the accused, the core allegation of rash/negligent driving remained unsubstantiated by credible witness testimony. The accused was granted benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Devgadh Baria Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused operated his vehicle recklessly and negligently on the specified date and location. The court noted that while the complainant and investigating officer identified the accused, the core allegation of rash/negligent driving remained unsubstantiated by credible witness testimony. The accused was granted benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts