Government of Gujarat vs Rajubhai Bhikhabhai Nayak — 941/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030011232026
Filing Number
941/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
941/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajubhai Bhikhabhai Nayak
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Court Summary The Devgadh Baria Magistrate Court dismissed proceedings against Rajubhai Bhikhabhai Nayak under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, holding that the offense is now non-cognizable following the 2017 amendment that repealed Section 118. The court reasoned that since the maximum punishment for a first-time liquor consumption offense is only six months imprisonment, it falls under Schedule I, Part II of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, classifying it as non-cognizable and requiring prior magistrate permission before cognizance can be taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 941/2026
Court Summary The Devgadh Baria Magistrate Court dismissed proceedings against Rajubhai Bhikhabhai Nayak under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, holding that the offense is now non-cognizable following the 2017 amendment that repealed Section 118. The court reasoned that since the maximum punishment for a first-time liquor consumption offense is only six months imprisonment, it falls under Schedule I, Part II of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, classifying it as non-cognizable and requiring prior magistrate permission before cognizance can be taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts