Government of Gujarat vs Sandipkumar Ashokbhai Sikligar Advocate - D H BARIA — 762/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 11th July 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030009362026

Filing Number

762/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

762/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821052251527

Police Station

PIPLOD POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandipkumar Ashokbhai Sikligar Advocate - D H BARIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jul-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 762/2026 The court found the accused guilty under Indian Penal Code Section 275 and sentenced him to a fine of ₹300, with an alternative of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The judgment considered the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, first-time offense, family dependence as sole earner, and socioeconomic circumstances to impose a reduced sentence rather than the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Jul-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 26-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-May-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 18-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 762/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 762/2026 The court found the accused guilty under Indian Penal Code Section 275 and sentenced him to a fine of ₹300, with an alternative of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The judgment considered the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, first-time offense, family dependence as sole earner, and socioeconomic circumstances to impose a reduced sentence rather than the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case