Government of Gujarat vs Rajubhai Premvirsinh Patel — 703/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030008652026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
703/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
703/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821052260086
Police Station
PIPLOD POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajubhai Premvirsinh Patel
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dropped criminal proceedings against the accused charged with liquor consumption under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court held that the 2017 Amendment reclassified the offense as non-cognizable (maximum 6 months imprisonment), requiring prior magistrate permission before police investigation, which was not obtained. Since the investigation was conducted illegally without this mandatory permission, the court could not take cognizance of the vitiated report and discharged the accused from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dropped criminal proceedings against the accused charged with liquor consumption under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court held that the 2017 Amendment reclassified the offense as non-cognizable (maximum 6 months imprisonment), requiring prior magistrate permission before police investigation, which was not obtained. Since the investigation was conducted illegally without this mandatory permission, the court could not take cognizance of the vitiated report and discharged the accused from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts