Government of Gujarat vs Mahendrabhai Rameshbhai Baria — 701/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030008632026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
701/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
701/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821052250995
Police Station
PIPLOD POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mahendrabhai Rameshbhai Baria
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable classification, making the offense non-cognizable with a maximum punishment under 3 years, requiring prior Magistrate permission for investigation under Section 155(2) CrPC. Since the investigating officer conducted the investigation without obtaining this mandatory permission, the investigation was deemed illegal and vitiated, precluding cognizance of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable classification, making the offense non-cognizable with a maximum punishment under 3 years, requiring prior Magistrate permission for investigation under Section 155(2) CrPC. Since the investigating officer conducted the investigation without obtaining this mandatory permission, the investigation was deemed illegal and vitiated, precluding cognizance of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts