Government of Gujarat vs Rameshbhai Govindbhai Vankar — 699/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030008612026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
699/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
699/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821052251013
Police Station
PIPLOD POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rameshbhai Govindbhai Vankar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court DROPPED criminal proceedings against the accused for liquor consumption under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable offense classification, making the offense non-cognizable (maximum punishment 6 months). Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior Magistrate's permission as mandated under CrPC Section 155(2) before investigating, the investigation was illegal and vitiated, rendering the charge-sheet inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court DROPPED criminal proceedings against the accused for liquor consumption under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable offense classification, making the offense non-cognizable (maximum punishment 6 months). Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior Magistrate's permission as mandated under CrPC Section 155(2) before investigating, the investigation was illegal and vitiated, rendering the charge-sheet inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts