Government of Gujarat vs Babubhai Bachubhai Baria — 470/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030006002026

Filing Number

470/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

470/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821050251343

Police Station

SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Babubhai Bachubhai Baria

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The court DROPPED all criminal proceedings against the accused for liquor consumption under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable classification, making the offense non-cognizable (maximum 6 months imprisonment). Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior Magistrate permission as required under Section 155(2) CrPC before investigation, the investigation was illegal and vitiated, rendering the charge-sheet inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 470/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court DROPPED all criminal proceedings against the accused for liquor consumption under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted the cognizable classification, making the offense non-cognizable (maximum 6 months imprisonment). Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior Magistrate permission as required under Section 155(2) CrPC before investigation, the investigation was illegal and vitiated, rendering the charge-sheet inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case