Government of Gujarat vs Vinodbhai Somabhai Parmar Advocate - V C BARIA — 339/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030004472026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

339/2026

Filing Date

02-02-2026

Registration No

339/2026

Registration Date

02-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PREVENTION OF GAMBLING ACT, 1887 Section 12,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vinodbhai Somabhai Parmar Advocate - V C BARIA

Rajubhai Somabhai Parmar

Adv. V C BARIA

Jayeshbhai Rameshbhai Patel

Adv. V C BARIA

Parsotam Alias Manubhai Laxmanbhai Harizan

Adv. V C BARIA

Rohitbhai Bakabhai Harizan

Adv. V C BARIA

Himatbhai Alias Lalo Abhesingbhai Dayra

Adv. V C BARIA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

10-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court convicted six accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 12, for illegal possession and sale of liquor worth ₹3,110. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing family responsibilities and poverty. The court imposed minimum sentences, ordering confiscation of recovered cash and contraband, destruction of non-valuable items post-appeal, and return of vehicles/mobile phones after ownership verification as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted six accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 12, for illegal possession and sale of liquor worth ₹3,110. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing family responsibilities and poverty. The court imposed minimum sentences, ordering confiscation of recovered cash and contraband, destruction of non-valuable items post-appeal, and return of vehicles/mobile phones after ownership verification as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case