Government of Gujarat vs Shabbirbhai Alias Manish Bharvad Yasimbhai Malek — 330/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030004352026
Filing Number
330/2026
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
330/2026
Registration Date
31-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shabbirbhai Alias Manish Bharvad Yasimbhai Malek
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The court ruled that offences under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act (drunk driving) and Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act (liquor consumption) are both non-cognizable offences, requiring prior court permission under Section 174(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before police investigation. Since this permission was not obtained, the court dropped all proceedings against the accused, holding that cognizance cannot be taken based on the charge-sheet alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 330/2026
Court Decision Summary The court ruled that offences under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act (drunk driving) and Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act (liquor consumption) are both non-cognizable offences, requiring prior court permission under Section 174(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before police investigation. Since this permission was not obtained, the court dropped all proceedings against the accused, holding that cognizance cannot be taken based on the charge-sheet alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts