Government of Gujarat vs Sahidbhai Umarfaruk Tiladi — 329/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030004342026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

329/2026

Filing Date

31-01-2026

Registration No

329/2026

Registration Date

31-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sahidbhai Umarfaruk Tiladi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The court dismissed proceedings against Sahidbhai Umarfaruk Tiladi for liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court held that following the 2017 amendment repealing Section 118 of the Act, offences under Section 66(1)(B) for first-time consumption (carrying maximum six-month imprisonment) are now classified as non-cognizable offences, and therefore cognizance cannot be taken without prior magistrate permission under Section 174(2) of the BNSS, 2023. The case was dropped with liberty for prosecution to pursue appropriate legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court dismissed proceedings against Sahidbhai Umarfaruk Tiladi for liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court held that following the 2017 amendment repealing Section 118 of the Act, offences under Section 66(1)(B) for first-time consumption (carrying maximum six-month imprisonment) are now classified as non-cognizable offences, and therefore cognizance cannot be taken without prior magistrate permission under Section 174(2) of the BNSS, 2023. The case was dropped with liberty for prosecution to pursue appropriate legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case