Government of Gujarat vs Dineshbhai Dalpatbhai Patel Advocate - V B PATEL — 328/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030004332026

Filing Number

328/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

328/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dineshbhai Dalpatbhai Patel Advocate - V B PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 and sentenced him to lighter punishment considering mitigating circumstances: a fine of Rs. 1,000 and Rs. 100, with 5 days simple imprisonment as default. The court exercised discretion to impose minimum sentence below the statutory requirement, considering the accused's poor financial status, first-time offender status, family responsibilities, remorse, and rehabilitation potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 328/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 and sentenced him to lighter punishment considering mitigating circumstances: a fine of Rs. 1,000 and Rs. 100, with 5 days simple imprisonment as default. The court exercised discretion to impose minimum sentence below the statutory requirement, considering the accused's poor financial status, first-time offender status, family responsibilities, remorse, and rehabilitation potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case