Government of Gujarat vs Kamleshbhai Somabhai Katara Advocate - K V BARIA — 327/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030004322026

Filing Number

327/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

327/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kamleshbhai Somabhai Katara Advocate - K V BARIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 and sentenced him to lenient punishment—a fine of ₹1,000 under IPC Section 185 and ₹100 under Prohibition Act Section 66(1-B), with 5 days simple imprisonment if fines remain unpaid. The court imposed minimal sentence considering the accused's poor financial background, first-time offense, remorse, and family responsibilities, while ordering confiscated vehicle property be returned to its rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 327/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 and sentenced him to lenient punishment—a fine of ₹1,000 under IPC Section 185 and ₹100 under Prohibition Act Section 66(1-B), with 5 days simple imprisonment if fines remain unpaid. The court imposed minimal sentence considering the accused's poor financial background, first-time offense, remorse, and family responsibilities, while ordering confiscated vehicle property be returned to its rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case