Government of Gujarat vs Alkeshbhai Gordhanbhai Ninama — 254/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030003552026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

254/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

254/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Alkeshbhai Gordhanbhai Ninama

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

06-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court held that both offences—Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act (drunk driving) and Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act (consumption of liquor, first offence)—are non-cognizable offences requiring prior magistrate permission under Section 174(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Since no such permission was obtained, the court declined to take cognizance and dropped all proceedings against the accused, allowing the prosecution liberty to pursue appropriate remedies under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court held that both offences—Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act (drunk driving) and Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act (consumption of liquor, first offence)—are non-cognizable offences requiring prior magistrate permission under Section 174(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Since no such permission was obtained, the court declined to take cognizance and dropped all proceedings against the accused, allowing the prosecution liberty to pursue appropriate remedies under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case