Government of Gujarat vs Jagdishbhai Amarsinh Parmar — 253/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030003542026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
253/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
253/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Jagdishbhai Amarsinh Parmar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court dismissed proceedings against Jagdishbhai Amarsinh Parmar for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, holding that the offense is non-cognizable. The 2017 amendment to the Prohibition Act repealed Section 118, which previously classified such offenses as cognizable; since the amended Act is silent on cognizability and the first offense carries maximum punishment of six months (less than three years), it falls under non-cognizable offenses per Schedule I, Part II of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that cognizance cannot be taken without prior permission under Section 174(2) BNSS, hence the proceedings were dropped. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court dismissed proceedings against Jagdishbhai Amarsinh Parmar for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, holding that the offense is non-cognizable. The 2017 amendment to the Prohibition Act repealed Section 118, which previously classified such offenses as cognizable; since the amended Act is silent on cognizability and the first offense carries maximum punishment of six months (less than three years), it falls under non-cognizable offenses per Schedule I, Part II of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that cognizance cannot be taken without prior permission under Section 174(2) BNSS, hence the proceedings were dropped. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts