Government of Gujarat vs Jagdishbhai Amarsinh Parmar — 253/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030003542026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

253/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Jagdishbhai Amarsinh Parmar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The court dismissed proceedings against Jagdishbhai Amarsinh Parmar for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, holding that the offense is non-cognizable. The 2017 amendment to the Prohibition Act repealed Section 118, which previously classified such offenses as cognizable; since the amended Act is silent on cognizability and the first offense carries maximum punishment of six months (less than three years), it falls under non-cognizable offenses per Schedule I, Part II of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that cognizance cannot be taken without prior permission under Section 174(2) BNSS, hence the proceedings were dropped. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dismissed proceedings against Jagdishbhai Amarsinh Parmar for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, holding that the offense is non-cognizable. The 2017 amendment to the Prohibition Act repealed Section 118, which previously classified such offenses as cognizable; since the amended Act is silent on cognizability and the first offense carries maximum punishment of six months (less than three years), it falls under non-cognizable offenses per Schedule I, Part II of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that cognizance cannot be taken without prior permission under Section 174(2) BNSS, hence the proceedings were dropped. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case