Government of Gujarat vs Parvatbhai Gamirbhai Baria — 251/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030003522026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

251/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

251/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Parvatbhai Gamirbhai Baria

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The court dismissed proceedings against the accused under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, holding that the offense has been reclassified as non-cognizable following the 2017 amendment. The court reasoned that the repeal of Section 118 (which previously declared prohibition offenses as cognizable) and the removal of cognizable language from Section 66(1)(B) means first-time liquor consumption offenses, carrying a maximum six-month sentence, now fall under non-cognizable classification per Schedule I, Part II of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Consequently, without prior magistrate permission under Section 174(2) BNSS, the court cannot take cognizance based on the complaint or charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dismissed proceedings against the accused under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, holding that the offense has been reclassified as non-cognizable following the 2017 amendment. The court reasoned that the repeal of Section 118 (which previously declared prohibition offenses as cognizable) and the removal of cognizable language from Section 66(1)(B) means first-time liquor consumption offenses, carrying a maximum six-month sentence, now fall under non-cognizable classification per Schedule I, Part II of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Consequently, without prior magistrate permission under Section 174(2) BNSS, the court cannot take cognizance based on the complaint or charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case