Government of Gujarat vs Bharatbhai Kuberbhai Damor Advocate - J S BARIA — 249/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030003502026

Filing Number

249/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

249/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharatbhai Kuberbhai Damor Advocate - J S BARIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 275 of the Indian Penal Code 2023 and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), imposing a lenient sentence considering his voluntary confession, remorse, first-time offense, family circumstances, and socio-economic condition. The National Legal Aid court found the accused guilty but exercised judicial discretion to impose minimal punishment rather than full statutory sentencing in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 249/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 275 of the Indian Penal Code 2023 and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), imposing a lenient sentence considering his voluntary confession, remorse, first-time offense, family circumstances, and socio-economic condition. The National Legal Aid court found the accused guilty but exercised judicial discretion to impose minimal punishment rather than full statutory sentencing in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case