Jahir Ali Gulamahmad Makrani vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 58/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI. - JMFC

CNR: GJDH030002892026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

58/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

58/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497,

Petitioner(s)

Jahir Ali Gulamahmad Makrani

Adv. M I MAKRANI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-03-2026

Disposed

03-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

02-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

25-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

19-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by the accused/applicant seeking release of four cattle (cows/calves) seized during transportation from police custody. The court upheld the lower courts' decision to retain custody of the animals with a Panjarapole (animal shelter) instead of returning them to the accused, reasoning that the cattle were transported without proper legal compliance under animal welfare rules, creating a presumption they were being taken for slaughter, and the animals' welfare and protection against cruelty takes precedence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by the accused/applicant seeking release of four cattle (cows/calves) seized during transportation from police custody. The court upheld the lower courts' decision to retain custody of the animals with a Panjarapole (animal shelter) instead of returning them to the accused, reasoning that the cattle were transported without proper legal compliance under animal welfare rules, creating a presumption they were being taken for slaughter, and the animals' welfare and protection against cruelty takes precedence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case