Jahir Ali Gulamahmad Makrani vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 58/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI. - JMFC
CNR: GJDH030002892026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
58/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
58/2026
Registration Date
22-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jahir Ali Gulamahmad Makrani
Adv. M I MAKRANI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 02-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 19-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by the accused/applicant seeking release of four cattle (cows/calves) seized during transportation from police custody. The court upheld the lower courts' decision to retain custody of the animals with a Panjarapole (animal shelter) instead of returning them to the accused, reasoning that the cattle were transported without proper legal compliance under animal welfare rules, creating a presumption they were being taken for slaughter, and the animals' welfare and protection against cruelty takes precedence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by the accused/applicant seeking release of four cattle (cows/calves) seized during transportation from police custody. The court upheld the lower courts' decision to retain custody of the animals with a Panjarapole (animal shelter) instead of returning them to the accused, reasoning that the cattle were transported without proper legal compliance under animal welfare rules, creating a presumption they were being taken for slaughter, and the animals' welfare and protection against cruelty takes precedence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts