PRIYANKA TARUNKUMAR CHAUHAN vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 1221/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - J
CNR: GJDH020082492025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1221/2025
Filing Date
12-12-2025
Registration No
1221/2025
Registration Date
12-12-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT DAHOD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRIYANKA TARUNKUMAR CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT | |
| 31-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 24-12-2025 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA-1221/2025 The court granted Priyanka Tarunkumar Chauhan's application under BNSS Section 497, ordering the release of Rs. 17,989 seized by police in a cyber fraud case to the applicant's bank account through electronic transfer. The court found the applicant entitled to the property (frozen funds) based on BNSS Section 503 (property seizure procedures) and directed the release subject to conditions including a bond of 1.5 times the amount and penalty provisions if ownership cannot be proven in court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA-1221/2025 The court granted Priyanka Tarunkumar Chauhan's application under BNSS Section 497, ordering the release of Rs. 17,989 seized by police in a cyber fraud case to the applicant's bank account through electronic transfer. The court found the applicant entitled to the property (frozen funds) based on BNSS Section 503 (property seizure procedures) and directed the release subject to conditions including a bond of 1.5 times the amount and penalty provisions if ownership cannot be proven in court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts