BADRIPRASAD RAMMURAT DUBE DIRECTOR OF VRJESHWARI STEEL PVT.LTD vs DEPUTY C.M.M Advocate - T S DAMOR — 4/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 7,12,38,39,. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
COMM CS - COMMERCIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJDH020069812025
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
10-10-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT DAHOD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BADRIPRASAD RAMMURAT DUBE DIRECTOR OF VRJESHWARI STEEL PVT.LTD
Adv. A M PARIKH
Respondent(s)
DEPUTY C.M.M Advocate - T S DAMOR
LOCO WORKS MANAGER,WESTERN RAILWAY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
ISSUES
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 03-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 27-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 12-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Commercial Court (Case No. 4/2025) dismissed the plaintiff's interim relief application under CPC Order-39, Rule-1 and Column-191. The plaintiff, a scrap dealer, had won an auction for 25,000 kilos of copper wire (Lot No. 6101780825) conducted by the defendant railway, depositing 10% of the bid amount, but the defendant later forfeited the deposit and refused delivery, claiming the plaintiff failed to submit a valid GPCB certificate as required. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and insufficient grounds for interim relief, thus denying the plaintiff's prayer to either deliver the auctioned goods or refund the 10% deposit with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Commercial Court (Case No. 4/2025) dismissed the plaintiff's interim relief application under CPC Order-39, Rule-1 and Column-191. The plaintiff, a scrap dealer, had won an auction for 25,000 kilos of copper wire (Lot No. 6101780825) conducted by the defendant railway, depositing 10% of the bid amount, but the defendant later forfeited the deposit and refused delivery, claiming the plaintiff failed to submit a valid GPCB certificate as required. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and insufficient grounds for interim relief, thus denying the plaintiff's prayer to either deliver the auctioned goods or refund the 10% deposit with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts