KOMALBEN W/O MILINBHAI PATEL D/O BHARATBHAI PATEL vs MILINBHAI HASMUKHBHAI PATEL Advocate - L R SINDHI — 79/2022
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,18,19,20,22,. Status: EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - J
CNR: GJDH020040902022
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
79/2022
Filing Date
03-10-2022
Registration No
79/2022
Registration Date
03-10-2022
Court
CIVIL COURT DAHOD
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KOMALBEN W/O MILINBHAI PATEL D/O BHARATBHAI PATEL
Adv. D S KAPADIA
MINOR NIVA MILINBHAI PATEL
Respondent(s)
MILINBHAI HASMUKHBHAI PATEL Advocate - L R SINDHI
GITABEN HASMUKHBHAI PATEL
Adv. L R SINDHI
HASMUKHBHAI CHUNILAL PATEL
Adv. B M KAYDAWALA
MIKINKUMAR HASMUKHBHAI PATEL
Adv. L R SINDHI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 02-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Interim Orders
Summary: The respondent's application for physical custody or visiting rights of his daughter was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The court held that under Section 21 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, read with Section 2A, only an aggrieved woman can file such applications, and custody matters fall under the jurisdiction of the District Court, not the Magistrate's Court. However, the earlier order dated 07.08.2025 granting virtual visitation (15 minutes on first and third Sundays) will continue until the end of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The respondent's application for physical custody or visiting rights of his daughter was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The court held that under Section 21 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, read with Section 2A, only an aggrieved woman can file such applications, and custody matters fall under the jurisdiction of the District Court, not the Magistrate's Court. However, the earlier order dated 07.08.2025 granting virtual visitation (15 minutes on first and third Sundays) will continue until the end of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts