Government of Gujarat vs GYANENDRASINH LALSINH SINH Advocate - S S BHABHOR — 2222/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A),324(4),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH020032452025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2222/2025
Filing Date
20-05-2025
Registration No
2222/2025
Registration Date
20-05-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT DAHOD
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GYANENDRASINH LALSINH SINH Advocate - S S BHABHOR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 23-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 20-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 02-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court held that criminal courts must exercise their available powers under Sections 309, 311, and 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to ensure the right to speedy trial, with a watchful trial judge being the better protector of this right than guidelines. Section 258 can be invoked to stop proceedings in special circumstances where the accused's presence cannot be secured or important prosecution witnesses are unavailable, making normal trial procedures impossible or impractical. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court held that criminal courts must exercise their available powers under Sections 309, 311, and 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to ensure the right to speedy trial, with a watchful trial judge being the better protector of this right than guidelines. Section 258 can be invoked to stop proceedings in special circumstances where the accused's presence cannot be secured or important prosecution witnesses are unavailable, making normal trial procedures impossible or impractical. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts