Government of Gujarat vs GYANENDRASINH LALSINH SINH Advocate - S S BHABHOR — 2222/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A),324(4). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH020032452025

Filing Number

2222/2025

Filing Date

20-May-2025

Registration No

2222/2025

Registration Date

20-May-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT DAHOD

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A),324(4)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GYANENDRASINH LALSINH SINH Advocate - S S BHABHOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court held that criminal courts must exercise their available powers under Sections 309, 311, and 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to ensure the right to speedy trial, with a watchful trial judge being the better protector of this right than guidelines. Section 258 can be invoked to stop proceedings in special circumstances where the accused's presence cannot be secured or important prosecution witnesses are unavailable, making normal trial procedures impossible or impractical. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 20-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Summons - Notice

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Summons - Notice

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 01-Sep-2025

    Summons - Notice

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 22-Aug-2025

    Summons - Notice

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 11-Jul-2025

    Summons - Notice

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 26-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 20-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2222/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court held that criminal courts must exercise their available powers under Sections 309, 311, and 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to ensure the right to speedy trial, with a watchful trial judge being the better protector of this right than guidelines. Section 258 can be invoked to stop proceedings in special circumstances where the accused's presence cannot be secured or important prosecution witnesses are unavailable, making normal trial procedures impossible or impractical. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case