MANPRITSINH MAHENDRASINH RATHOD vs USHABEN SAMYULBHAI DAMOR Advocate - D M DASANI — 58/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJDH010031302025

Filing Number

58/2025

Filing Date

24-Nov-2025

Registration No

58/2025

Registration Date

24-Nov-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT DAHOD

Judge

3-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANPRITSINH MAHENDRASINH RATHOD

    Adv. R S AGRAWAL

  2. 2.VIRENDRABHAI MAHENDRASINH RATHOD

    Adv. R S AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.USHABEN SAMYULBHAI DAMOR Advocate - D M DASANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court allowed the applicants' application to condone a 339-day delay in filing a Regular Civil Appeal, finding sufficient cause because the delay resulted from circumstances beyond their control—specifically, the illness and subsequent death of their advocate on 08.09.2025. The court ordered the delay to be condoned subject to the applicants paying Rs. 10,000 costs to the respondent within 14 days, after which the appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Reply

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Reply

    3rd Addl District Judge

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 58/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicants' application to condone a 339-day delay in filing a Regular Civil Appeal, finding sufficient cause because the delay resulted from circumstances beyond their control—specifically, the illness and subsequent death of their advocate on 08.09.2025. The court ordered the delay to be condoned subject to the applicants paying Rs. 10,000 costs to the respondent within 14 days, after which the appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case