SATISHBHAI RAMESHBHAI DHAPANIYA vs ASHA NARAYAN SWAMI Advocate - K B SHARMA — 37/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374,. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 25th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJDH010007722024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

37/2024

Filing Date

01-04-2024

Registration No

37/2024

Registration Date

01-04-2024

Court

DISTRICT COURT DAHOD

Judge

3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 374,

Petitioner(s)

SATISHBHAI RAMESHBHAI DHAPANIYA

Adv. D S KAPADIA

Respondent(s)

ASHA NARAYAN SWAMI Advocate - K B SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

25-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

07-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

20-01-2026

FINAL HEARING

08-12-2025

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
ORDER

Summary: The court set aside the trial court's conviction of the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (which imposed 2 years imprisonment and Rs. 1,50,000 compensation) and acquitted him after the appellant and complainant reached a settlement during appeal. The court, finding the compromise reflected the parties' positive attitude, waived costs and ordered Rs. 30,000 (20% of deposited fine) be paid to the complainant, while discharging the bail bond and directing return of the appellant's passport if deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

08-04-2024
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court set aside the trial court's conviction of the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (which imposed 2 years imprisonment and Rs. 1,50,000 compensation) and acquitted him after the appellant and complainant reached a settlement during appeal. The court, finding the compromise reflected the parties' positive attitude, waived costs and ordered Rs. 30,000 (20% of deposited fine) be paid to the complainant, while discharging the bail bond and directing return of the appellant's passport if deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT DAHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case