MUKESHBHAI KANUBHAI KHEMCHANDBHAI PANCHAL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - AGP — 224/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLI - SESSIONS

CNR: GJDH010007262026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

224/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

224/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT DAHOD

Judge

3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821049260171

Police Station

JESAVADA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

MUKESHBHAI KANUBHAI KHEMCHANDBHAI PANCHAL

Adv. S S BHABHOR

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court granted regular bail to Mukeshbhai Kanubhai Khemchandbhai Panchal, accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act by transporting IMFL (Indian Made Foreign Liquor). The court found that the quantity of beer allegedly seized from the accused was only 72 bottles (valued at Rs. 13,680), considering his medical condition (liver ailment), and the fact that prolonged custody served no purpose when investigation and trial could take considerable time. Bail was granted on a surety bond of Rs. 15,000 with standard conditions including maintaining the registered address and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted regular bail to Mukeshbhai Kanubhai Khemchandbhai Panchal, accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act by transporting IMFL (Indian Made Foreign Liquor). The court found that the quantity of beer allegedly seized from the accused was only 72 bottles (valued at Rs. 13,680), considering his medical condition (liver ailment), and the fact that prolonged custody served no purpose when investigation and trial could take considerable time. Bail was granted on a surety bond of Rs. 15,000 with standard conditions including maintaining the registered address and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT DAHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case