HUN NATHABHAI AALABHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 54/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJDH010007022026

Filing Number

54/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT DAHOD

Judge

3-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HUN NATHABHAI AALABHAI

    Adv. A S SELOT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary: The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Dahod dismissed the criminal revision application and confirmed the trial court's order rejecting the applicant's request to release a vehicle seized under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court held that under Section 98(2) of the Act and Rule 9 of the Gujarat Prohibition Rules (as amended in 2019), vehicles used to transport liquor exceeding 20 liters cannot be released on bond or surety until final judgment, and found no illegality in the trial court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Dahod dismissed the criminal revision application and confirmed the trial court's order rejecting the applicant's request to release a vehicle seized under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court held that under Section 98(2) of the Act and Rule 9 of the Gujarat Prohibition Rules (as amended in 2019), vehicles used to transport liquor exceeding 20 liters cannot be released on bond or surety until final judgment, and found no illegality in the trial court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case