DILIPBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI SHANKATPRASAD SHRIVASTAVA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 222/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLI - SESSIONS
CNR: GJDH010006992026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
222/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
222/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT DAHOD
Judge
3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DILIPBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI SHANKATPRASAD SHRIVASTAVA
Adv. M H PUROHIT
MAHAVIRSINGH ABHAYSINGH SHIVNATHSINGH CHAUHAN
Adv. M H PUROHIT
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Dahod Additional District and Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of two accused persons (Dilipbhai Ghanshyambhai Shrivastava and Mahaveersingh Abhaysingh Chauhan) charged with criminal breach of trust and cheating involving Rs. 35.91 lakh in a well-planned fraud scheme targeting pulse traders. The court found them to be prime accused in an organized cheating racket, noting their prior similar criminal records, risk of witness tampering, and the economic-heinous nature of the crime, determining that bail would adversely impact the trial and public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Dahod Additional District and Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of two accused persons (Dilipbhai Ghanshyambhai Shrivastava and Mahaveersingh Abhaysingh Chauhan) charged with criminal breach of trust and cheating involving Rs. 35.91 lakh in a well-planned fraud scheme targeting pulse traders. The court found them to be prime accused in an organized cheating racket, noting their prior similar criminal records, risk of witness tampering, and the economic-heinous nature of the crime, determining that bail would adversely impact the trial and public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts