SANJAYBHAI REVANBHAI HATHILA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - AGP — 217/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLI - SESSIONS
CNR: GJDH010006242026
Filing Number
217/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
217/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT DAHOD
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821033250115
Police Station
LIMDI POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI REVANBHAI HATHILA
Adv. A R CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Sessions Court of Dahod rejected the regular bail application of Sanjaybhai Revanbhai Hathhila under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found a prima-facie case against the applicant for inflicting fatal 'dhariya' blows on the deceased's head during a quarrel, supported by medical evidence, and held that the principle of parity did not apply since his role was more serious than a co-accused already granted bail by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 217/2026
Summary The Sessions Court of Dahod rejected the regular bail application of Sanjaybhai Revanbhai Hathhila under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found a prima-facie case against the applicant for inflicting fatal 'dhariya' blows on the deceased's head during a quarrel, supported by medical evidence, and held that the principle of parity did not apply since his role was more serious than a co-accused already granted bail by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts