THE SANKHEDA NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LI. NA OFFICER TRIVEDI DIPAKKUMAR BHANUPRASAD ( vs MOHAMMAD AZHARUDDIN FAROOQBHAI SHEIKH — 1677/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJCU030018882025

Filing Number

1677/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

1677/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANKHEDA

Judge

3-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

1.THE SANKHEDA NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LI. NA OFFICER TRIVEDI DIPAKKUMAR BHANUPRASAD (

Respondent(s)

1.MOHAMMAD AZHARUDDIN FAROOQBHAI SHEIKH

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
18-Apr-2026

OrderView PDF

The court allowed the petitioner (Sankheda Nagrik Sahakari Bank officer Trivedi Dipakkumar) to withdraw the criminal case No. 1677/2025 against Mohammad Azharuddin Farooqbhai Sheikh. The case was settled through the Lok Adalat (permanent public court) on April 18, 2026, based on the withdrawal petition filed by the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
18-Apr-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
17-Apr-2026

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
24-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
18-Feb-2026

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
15-Jan-2026

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
30-Dec-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
18-Nov-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 1677/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioner (Sankheda Nagrik Sahakari Bank officer Trivedi Dipakkumar) to withdraw the criminal case No. 1677/2025 against Mohammad Azharuddin Farooqbhai Sheikh. The case was settled through the Lok Adalat (permanent public court) on April 18, 2026, based on the withdrawal petition filed by the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.