The State of Gujarat vs DINESHBHAI URFE VINOD MANGANATH RATHOD Advocate - A R CHAVDA — 532/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT050008572025

Case disposed

Filing Number

532/2025

Filing Date

05-12-2025

Registration No

532/2025

Registration Date

06-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190001250282

Police Station

BARVALA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DINESHBHAI URFE VINOD MANGANATH RATHOD Advocate - A R CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

12-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

18-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court sentenced the accused, Dineshbhai Urfe Vinod Manganath Rathod, to imprisonment under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 65(a)(a)) for illegally possessing 18 liters of country liquor valued at ₹3,600 found in his residential warehouse on 29/07/2025. The court also imposed a fine of ₹5,000, with a default imprisonment provision, finding sufficient evidence against the accused based on witness testimonies and physical evidence presented by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court sentenced the accused, Dineshbhai Urfe Vinod Manganath Rathod, to imprisonment under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 65(a)(a)) for illegally possessing 18 liters of country liquor valued at ₹3,600 found in his residential warehouse on 29/07/2025. The court also imposed a fine of ₹5,000, with a default imprisonment provision, finding sufficient evidence against the accused based on witness testimonies and physical evidence presented by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case