The State of Gujarat vs ARVINDBHAI URFEE BHURO CHHANABHAI GORAHVA Advocate - A R CHAVDA — 427/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT050007302025

Case disposed

Filing Number

427/2025

Filing Date

04-11-2025

Registration No

427/2025

Registration Date

04-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190001240265

Police Station

BARVALA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A),(A)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ARVINDBHAI URFEE BHURO CHHANABHAI GORAHVA Advocate - A R CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

20-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

12-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

24-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 427/2025 The court acquitted the accused Arvindbhai Urfee Bhuro Chhanabhai Gorahva of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence presented by witnesses was insufficient and lacked independent corroboration, with no reliable documentary support such as FSL reports to substantiate the alleged illegal possession of 15 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 300. Consequently, the accused was ordered released on bail, and a fine of Rs. 5,000 was imposed in the alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 427/2025 The court acquitted the accused Arvindbhai Urfee Bhuro Chhanabhai Gorahva of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence presented by witnesses was insufficient and lacked independent corroboration, with no reliable documentary support such as FSL reports to substantiate the alleged illegal possession of 15 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 300. Consequently, the accused was ordered released on bail, and a fine of Rs. 5,000 was imposed in the alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case