PRAVINBHAI BHARATHBHAI PARMAR vs NARESHBHAI RABARI — 3/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJBT050006552022

Case disposed

Filing Number

3/2022

Filing Date

22-08-2022

Registration No

3/2022

Registration Date

22-08-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,324,504,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

PRAVINBHAI BHARATHBHAI PARMAR

Adv. D K BHADIYADRA

Respondent(s)

NARESHBHAI RABARI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

13-05-2026

Disposed

07-05-2026

HEARING

02-05-2026

HEARING

24-04-2026

HEARING

25-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-05-2026
ORDER

Case 3/2022 Summary Pravinbhai Bharathbhai Parmar v. Nareshbhai Rabari The court dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Pravinbhai Bharathbhai Parmar against PSI Nareshbhai Rabari under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, and 506(2), finding the petitioner's allegations of assault and extortion to be unsubstantiated and contradicted by medical evidence and witness statements. The court noted that the petitioner's account lacked credibility, the injuries described as "simple" did not corroborate violent allegations, and no independent corroborating evidence supported the FIR, warranting dismissal under CrPC section 203. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 3/2022 Summary Pravinbhai Bharathbhai Parmar v. Nareshbhai Rabari The court dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Pravinbhai Bharathbhai Parmar against PSI Nareshbhai Rabari under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, and 506(2), finding the petitioner's allegations of assault and extortion to be unsubstantiated and contradicted by medical evidence and witness statements. The court noted that the petitioner's account lacked credibility, the injuries described as "simple" did not corroborate violent allegations, and no independent corroborating evidence supported the FIR, warranting dismissal under CrPC section 203. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case