THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI BACHUBHAI VALA Advocate - P M RATHOD — 449/2024
Case under The Gujarat Animal Preservation (amendment) Act, 2017 Section 5,6,6(K)(1),6(K)(3),6(4),8,9,10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT050005012024
Filing Number
449/2024
Filing Date
11-07-2024
Registration No
449/2024
Registration Date
11-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BARWALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190001240143
Police Station
BARVALA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DINESHBHAI BACHUBHAI VALA Advocate - P M RATHOD
VIPULBHAI BHALABHAI VALA
Adv. P M RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 23-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 449/2024 The Gujarat High Court acquitted two accused (Dineshbhai Bachubhai Vala and Vipulbhai Bhalabhai Vala) of animal cruelty charges under Gujarat Animal Preservation Act 1954 and Animal Welfare Act 1960, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite eyewitness testimonies and veterinary evidence. The court emphasized inadequate investigation, inconsistent witness accounts, and insufficient corroboration undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 449/2024 The Gujarat High Court acquitted two accused (Dineshbhai Bachubhai Vala and Vipulbhai Bhalabhai Vala) of animal cruelty charges under Gujarat Animal Preservation Act 1954 and Animal Welfare Act 1960, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite eyewitness testimonies and veterinary evidence. The court emphasized inadequate investigation, inconsistent witness accounts, and insufficient corroboration undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts