RAVIRAJSINH VIPULSINH PARMAR vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 32/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBT050001772026

Filing Number

32/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

0

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVIRAJSINH VIPULSINH PARMAR

    Adv. P M RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA 32/2026 The court allowed Ravirajsinh Vipulsinh Parmar's application for recovery of ₹5,540 seized in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner's account was compromised, resulting in ₹10,358 transferred to a fraudulent SBI account and ₹361 to a fake Jio Payments Bank account. The investigating officer confirmed the accounts appeared to be created solely for fraud. The court granted interim custody of the seized amount to the petitioner upon furnishing personal surety and sureties equivalent to 1.5 times the amount, with banks directed to transfer the funds within 10 days. The fraudulent accounts are to be permanently closed post-transfer to prevent further misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA 32/2026 The court allowed Ravirajsinh Vipulsinh Parmar's application for recovery of ₹5,540 seized in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner's account was compromised, resulting in ₹10,358 transferred to a fraudulent SBI account and ₹361 to a fake Jio Payments Bank account. The investigating officer confirmed the accounts appeared to be created solely for fraud. The court granted interim custody of the seized amount to the petitioner upon furnishing personal surety and sureties equivalent to 1.5 times the amount, with banks directed to transfer the funds within 10 days. The fraudulent accounts are to be permanently closed post-transfer to prevent further misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case