The State of Gujarat vs AKHABHAI @ ASHOKBHAI KALUBHAI MANDURYA Advocate - P.M.RATHOD — 68/2020

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Animal Preservation Act, 1954 Section 5,6,6(b),(1),(2),(3),6(K),8,10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT050000942020

Filing Number

68/2020

Filing Date

07-Mar-2020

Registration No

68/2020

Registration Date

07-Mar-2020

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

04

Police Station

BARVALA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Animal Preservation Act, 1954 Section 5,6,6(b),(1),(2),(3),6(K),8,10
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 11DEFH,11(E)(L),11(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AKHABHAI @ ASHOKBHAI KALUBHAI MANDURYA Advocate - P.M.RATHOD

  2. 2.RAGHUBHAI SONDABHAI SATIYA

  3. 3.SAHIL @ FIROJSHA BHIKHUSHA FAKIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Case No. 68/2020 The Gujarat High Court acquitted three accused of animal cruelty charges under the Gujarat Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1954, finding insufficient evidence. The State failed to establish that the accused had tied animals without food/water in their vehicle during a police raid. The court held that witness testimony was contradictory, investigative evidence was weak, and crucial corroborating facts regarding animal custody and seizure procedures were missing from the record. Consequently, the benefit of reasonable doubt was granted to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 21-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 30-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 01-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 02-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 29-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 03-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 29-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 29-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 19-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 23-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 05-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 24-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 13-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 08-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 23-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 17-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 28-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 24-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 10-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 17-Jan-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 16-Dec-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 14-Nov-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 19-Oct-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 20-Sep-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 22-Aug-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 18-Jul-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 27-Jun-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 23-May-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 11-Apr-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 28-Feb-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 19-Jan-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 21-Dec-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 18-Nov-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 12-Oct-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 14-Sep-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 07-Sep-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 02-Aug-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 06-Jul-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 31-May-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 29-Apr-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 30-Mar-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 23-Feb-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 18-Jan-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 17-Dec-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 25-Nov-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  68. 08-Oct-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  69. 03-Sep-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  70. 21-Jul-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  71. 15-Jun-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  72. 22-Apr-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  73. 07-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2020

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Case No. 68/2020 The Gujarat High Court acquitted three accused of animal cruelty charges under the Gujarat Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1954, finding insufficient evidence. The State failed to establish that the accused had tied animals without food/water in their vehicle during a police raid. The court held that witness testimony was contradictory, investigative evidence was weak, and crucial corroborating facts regarding animal custody and seizure procedures were missing from the record. Consequently, the benefit of reasonable doubt was granted to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case