THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NAGARBHAI GHUGHABHAI JILIYA Advocate - N G VAHOYA — 950/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT040011952022
Filing Number
950/2022
Filing Date
01-Aug-2022
Registration No
950/2022
Registration Date
01-Aug-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, RANPUR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190006210687
Police Station
RANPUR POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAGARBHAI GHUGHABHAI JILIYA Advocate - N G VAHOYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C.NO.950/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Nagarbhai Ghughabhai Jiliya) of charges under IPC sections 506(2) (criminal intimidation) and 135 (violation of religious assembly rules), finding insufficient evidence to establish the allegations of threatening the complainant with bodily harm and death. Key Reasoning: The judge concluded that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused threatened the complainant or caused criminal intimidation, as witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked corroboration, and no credible evidence demonstrated the accused's alleged threats regarding harm to the complainant's life and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Dec-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 950/2022
Case Summary: C.C.NO.950/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Nagarbhai Ghughabhai Jiliya) of charges under IPC sections 506(2) (criminal intimidation) and 135 (violation of religious assembly rules), finding insufficient evidence to establish the allegations of threatening the complainant with bodily harm and death. Key Reasoning: The judge concluded that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused threatened the complainant or caused criminal intimidation, as witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked corroboration, and no credible evidence demonstrated the accused's alleged threats regarding harm to the complainant's life and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts