THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HARSHADBHAI HIRABHAI SAKALIYA Advocate - N G VAHOYA — 894/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT040010062022
Filing Number
894/2022
Filing Date
26-07-2022
Registration No
894/2022
Registration Date
26-07-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, RANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190006200213
Police Station
RANPUR POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HARSHADBHAI HIRABHAI SAKALIYA Advocate - N G VAHOYA
VINODBHAI KALUBHAI SAKALIYA
PRAVINBHAI KALUBHAI SAKALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 30-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 22-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 18-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Harshadbhai Hirabhai Sakaliya (C.C. NO.894/2022) The court acquitted the three respondents of charges under IPC Sections 504, 506(2), 114, and IPC Section 135, finding insufficient evidence of guilty intent and clear incitement. The prosecution failed to establish that the alleged abusive language and threats constituted unambiguous provocation to violence or that the respondents instigated a child to commit the alleged acts. The court emphasized that mere abusive words without specific, concrete threats of serious harm insufficient to constitute criminal intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Harshadbhai Hirabhai Sakaliya (C.C. NO.894/2022) The court acquitted the three respondents of charges under IPC Sections 504, 506(2), 114, and IPC Section 135, finding insufficient evidence of guilty intent and clear incitement. The prosecution failed to establish that the alleged abusive language and threats constituted unambiguous provocation to violence or that the respondents instigated a child to commit the alleged acts. The court emphasized that mere abusive words without specific, concrete threats of serious harm insufficient to constitute criminal intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts