THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs TRIKAMBHAI JESINGBHAI PARMAR Advocate - N G VASOYA — 395/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT040005402021
Filing Number
395/2021
Filing Date
08-03-2021
Registration No
395/2021
Registration Date
08-03-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, RANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
TRIKAMBHAI JESINGBHAI PARMAR Advocate - N G VASOYA
JITUBEN TRIKAMBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 30-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 22-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 03-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary Case C.C. NO.395/2021 The Court acquitted both accused under IPC Sections 504, 506(2), 114, and 135 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused intentionally abused the state officer with words/gestures causing a breach of peace, or that they instigated unlawful assembly with the requisite criminal intent. Witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked specificity regarding the exact abusive language used, and the investigation records did not conclusively prove the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case C.C. NO.395/2021 The Court acquitted both accused under IPC Sections 504, 506(2), 114, and 135 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused intentionally abused the state officer with words/gestures causing a breach of peace, or that they instigated unlawful assembly with the requisite criminal intent. Witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked specificity regarding the exact abusive language used, and the investigation records did not conclusively prove the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts