THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DAYABHAI GOVINDBHAI JADAV Advocate - G.M.PARMAR — 537/2017
Case under Arms Act Section 025. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT040004282017
Filing Number
537/2017
Filing Date
17-11-2017
Registration No
537/2017
Registration Date
17-11-2017
Court
TALUKA COURT, RANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
RANPUR POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DAYABHAI GOVINDBHAI JADAV Advocate - G.M.PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 22-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 08-12-2025 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Dayabhai Govindbhai Jadav (CC 537/2017) The court acquitted the accused Dayabhai Govindbhai Jadav of illegal arms possession charges under Arms Act Section 25(1)(b)(a). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt because the seizure of the unlicensed pistol (valued ₹5,000) lacked independent corroboration from neutral witnesses, relying solely on police testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Dayabhai Govindbhai Jadav (CC 537/2017) The court acquitted the accused Dayabhai Govindbhai Jadav of illegal arms possession charges under Arms Act Section 25(1)(b)(a). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt because the seizure of the unlicensed pistol (valued ₹5,000) lacked independent corroboration from neutral witnesses, relying solely on police testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts