HASINABEN D/O ABDULBHAI MANKAD AND W/O MAHADBHAI KALYANI vs KALUBHAI ABDULBHAI MANKAD Advocate - D J ZALA — 2/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,35,39. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 02nd May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT040000242026
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, RANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HASINABEN D/O ABDULBHAI MANKAD AND W/O MAHADBHAI KALYANI
Adv. J K SOMANI
ZARINABEN D/O ABDULBHAI MAKAD AND W/O IKBALBHAI SELAT
AABEDABEN D/O KALUBHAI ABDULBHAI MANKAD AND W/O MUNIRBHAI VADADARIYA
SHARIFABEN D/O KALUBHAI ABDULBHAI MANKAD AND W/O FARIDBHAI VADIYA
TANUJABEN D/O KALUBHAI ABDULBHAI MANKAD AND W/O SIRAJBHAI GAANJA
Respondent(s)
KALUBHAI ABDULBHAI MANKAD Advocate - D J ZALA
IKBALBHAI KALUBHAI MANKAD
Adv. D J ZALA
BASIRBHAI KALUBHAI MANKAD
Adv. D J ZALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 13-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 12-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 13-02-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petitioners' appeal filed under Article 10, finding that the case was required to be refiled with technical corrections and proper documentation. The court conditionally allowed the case to proceed on the condition that the petitioners file it afresh with the necessary amendments, and ordered the court fees to be refunded according to regulations. The judgment, issued on 02/05/2026 by the Principal Civil Judge in Rajkot, directed the parties to comply with procedural requirements before the matter could be heard on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petitioners' appeal filed under Article 10, finding that the case was required to be refiled with technical corrections and proper documentation. The court conditionally allowed the case to proceed on the condition that the petitioners file it afresh with the necessary amendments, and ordered the court fees to be refunded according to regulations. The judgment, issued on 02/05/2026 by the Principal Civil Judge in Rajkot, directed the parties to comply with procedural requirements before the matter could be heard on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts