APABHAI BANUBHAI GADHAVI vs SHANTIBHAI DILUBHAI GADHAVI Advocate - D.A.MALVANIYA — 1550/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 06th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030037972019
Filing Number
1550/2019
Filing Date
24-12-2019
Registration No
1550/2019
Registration Date
24-12-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
APABHAI BANUBHAI GADHAVI
Adv. M.V.SOJITRA
Respondent(s)
SHANTIBHAI DILUBHAI GADHAVI Advocate - D.A.MALVANIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 06-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 05-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 1550/2019 The Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused (Shantibhai Dilubhai Gadhavi) under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, for dishonoring a cheque worth Rs. 10 lakhs issued by the complainant (Apabhai Banubhai Gadhavi). The court found that despite sufficient funds being allegedly available, the accused failed to pay the cheque amount within the statutory period, constituting criminal breach of faith. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 9 lakhs compensation to the complainant, with additional monetary penalties prescribed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 1550/2019 The Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused (Shantibhai Dilubhai Gadhavi) under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, for dishonoring a cheque worth Rs. 10 lakhs issued by the complainant (Apabhai Banubhai Gadhavi). The court found that despite sufficient funds being allegedly available, the accused failed to pay the cheque amount within the statutory period, constituting criminal breach of faith. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 9 lakhs compensation to the complainant, with additional monetary penalties prescribed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts