SAVJIBHAI MAVJIBHAI LAKHANI(Legal Heir) vs JYOTSHANABEN JASVANTRAY SOMANI Advocate - A S METALIYA — 196/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,39. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT030037662022
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
196/2022
Filing Date
17-10-2022
Registration No
196/2022
Registration Date
17-10-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAVJIBHAI MAVJIBHAI LAKHANI(Legal Heir)
Adv. M P LAKHANI1.
Devrajbhai Savjibhai Lakhani 1.
Bhimjibhai Savjibhai Lakhani 1.
Sureshbhai Savjibhai Lakhani 1.
Manjulaben Ranchhodbhai Lakhani 1.
Nileshbhai Ranchodbhai lakhani 1.
Pravinbhai Ranchodbhai Lakhani
NANUBHAI @MAHESHAKUMAR SAVJIBHAI LAKHANI
Respondent(s)
JYOTSHANABEN JASVANTRAY SOMANI Advocate - A S METALIYA
CHINTANKUMAR JASVANTRAY SOMANI(JIO COMPNIY GADHADA DISTRIBUTAR)
Adv. K J PANCHOLI
SUMIT DIJITAL INFASTARKCHAR COMPNIY L.OTHORAYJ CONTRACTAR
Adv. EX PARTY
JERAMBHAI CHAGANBHAI LATHIYA(Abated)
Adv. EX PARTY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 27-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 13-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 02-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case 196/2022 Summary Petitioner(s): Savjibhai Mavjibhai Lakhani (Legal Heir), Devrajbhai Savjibhai Lakhani, and Bhimjibhai Savjibhai Lakhani Respondent(s): Jyotshanaben Jasvantray Somani (Advocate), A.S. Metaliya, Chintankumar Jasvantray Somani (JIO Company Gadhada Distributor), and Sumit Digital Infrastructure Company --- Outcome: The court partially granted the petitioner's appeal. The petition concerning unauthorized mobile tower construction on plot no. 10 (granted only for residential purposes) was partially allowed. The court ordered respondents to maintain the status quo on the residential land plot and directed the appropriate authorities to take action. No costs awarded, and the petition remains pending for final resolution regarding the mobile tower structure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 196/2022 Summary Petitioner(s): Savjibhai Mavjibhai Lakhani (Legal Heir), Devrajbhai Savjibhai Lakhani, and Bhimjibhai Savjibhai Lakhani Respondent(s): Jyotshanaben Jasvantray Somani (Advocate), A.S. Metaliya, Chintankumar Jasvantray Somani (JIO Company Gadhada Distributor), and Sumit Digital Infrastructure Company --- Outcome: The court partially granted the petitioner's appeal. The petition concerning unauthorized mobile tower construction on plot no. 10 (granted only for residential purposes) was partially allowed. The court ordered respondents to maintain the status quo on the residential land plot and directed the appropriate authorities to take action. No costs awarded, and the petition remains pending for final resolution regarding the mobile tower structure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts