THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMESHBHAI MOHANBHAI DAV Advocate - V K SODHATAR — 2263/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030033222025
Filing Number
2263/2025
Filing Date
02-12-2025
Registration No
2263/2025
Registration Date
02-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190004251384
Police Station
GADHADA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAMESHBHAI MOHANBHAI DAV Advocate - V K SODHATAR
JAYDPBHAI MENANDBHAI LAVADIYA
Adv. V K SODHATAR
RAJDIPBHAI MENANDBHAI LAVADIYA
Adv. V K SODHATAR
DHIRAJBHAI HAMIRBHAI LAVADIYA
Adv. V K SODHATAR
HAMIRBHAI HARSURBHAI LAVADIYA
Adv. V K SODHATAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Gujarat High Court acquitted five accused persons (Rameshbhai Mohanbhai Dav, Jaydipbhai Menandbhai Lavadiya, Rajdipbhai Menandbhai Lavadiya, Dhirajbhai Hamirbhai Lavadiya, and Hamirbhai Harsurbhai Lavadiya) of charges under IPC Sections 349, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54, and IPC Section 135, finding the prosecution case insufficient. The court directed that seized case property be destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court acquitted five accused persons (Rameshbhai Mohanbhai Dav, Jaydipbhai Menandbhai Lavadiya, Rajdipbhai Menandbhai Lavadiya, Dhirajbhai Hamirbhai Lavadiya, and Hamirbhai Harsurbhai Lavadiya) of charges under IPC Sections 349, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54, and IPC Section 135, finding the prosecution case insufficient. The court directed that seized case property be destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts