P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs ODHABHAI GOBARBHAI DUDHREJIYA — 286/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 021,R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBT030031412025

Filing Number

286/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

286/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 021,R11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1

    Adv. C R TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ODHABHAI GOBARBHAI DUDHREJIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition under CPC 1908, Rule 21 and Order 105(2) due to the creditor's (petitioner's) non-appearance and failure to pursue proceedings. The court found that the creditor's prolonged absence, lack of interest in advancing the case, and inaction—which caused the case to remain pending for over six months—constituted sufficient grounds for dismissal. The court noted that no legitimate legal reason justified granting further time, and therefore issued an order to dismiss (D.S.) the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 286/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition under CPC 1908, Rule 21 and Order 105(2) due to the creditor's (petitioner's) non-appearance and failure to pursue proceedings. The court found that the creditor's prolonged absence, lack of interest in advancing the case, and inaction—which caused the case to remain pending for over six months—constituted sufficient grounds for dismissal. The court noted that no legitimate legal reason justified granting further time, and therefore issued an order to dismiss (D.S.) the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case