P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs ODHABHAI GOBARBHAI DUDHREJIYA — 286/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 021,R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBT030031412025

Case disposed

Filing Number

286/2025

Filing Date

10-11-2025

Registration No

286/2025

Registration Date

10-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 021,R11

Petitioner(s)

P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1

Adv. C R TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

ODHABHAI GOBARBHAI DUDHREJIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

21-02-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

22-01-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

18-12-2025

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
ORDER

The court dismissed the petition under CPC 1908, Rule 21 and Order 105(2) due to the creditor's (petitioner's) non-appearance and failure to pursue proceedings. The court found that the creditor's prolonged absence, lack of interest in advancing the case, and inaction—which caused the case to remain pending for over six months—constituted sufficient grounds for dismissal. The court noted that no legitimate legal reason justified granting further time, and therefore issued an order to dismiss (D.S.) the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition under CPC 1908, Rule 21 and Order 105(2) due to the creditor's (petitioner's) non-appearance and failure to pursue proceedings. The court found that the creditor's prolonged absence, lack of interest in advancing the case, and inaction—which caused the case to remain pending for over six months—constituted sufficient grounds for dismissal. The court noted that no legitimate legal reason justified granting further time, and therefore issued an order to dismiss (D.S.) the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case